Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status

Yes, moving away from SHA1 is a good idea. We should do that asap. But I 
really dislike that this comes with an increased fingerprint size to 256 bits.


Wouldn't anything else require truncation, and thus not give us the extra 
safety we're looking for?

-- 
singpolyma, not a cryptographer

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, (continued) Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, brian m. carlson Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, vedaal Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, brian m. carlson Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Derek Atkins Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Vincent Breitmoser Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Stephen Paul Weber <= Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Salz, Rich Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Salz, Rich Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Daniel Kahn Gillmor Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Kristian Fiskerstrand Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Daniel Kahn Gillmor Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Vincent Breitmoser Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Daniel Kahn Gillmor Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Werner Koch

Previous by Date:	Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen
Next by Date:	Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen
Previous by Thread:	Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen
Next by Thread:	Re: [openpgp] Summary of WG status, Robert J. Hansen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]