On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 14:57,
wiktor=40metacode(_dot_)biz(_at_)dmarc(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org said:
Is the timestamping flag intentional?
I guess so.
It doesn't seem to be related to v5 signatures.
I posted combined diff of Heiko's pacthes. Here is his timestamp patch.
IIRC, we have talked in the past about it.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
commit 5ba02a3d8fcb59ceadf4940b51dc3701d0c60ab5
Author: Heiko Stamer <heikostamer(_at_)gmx(_dot_)net>
Date: Wed Oct 24 17:57:36 2018 +0000
Added a flag for keys used for timestamping
Modified middle.mkd
diff --git a/middle.mkd b/middle.mkd
index 2d64c0f..c7657d4 100644
--- a/middle.mkd
+++ b/middle.mkd
@@ -1504,8 +1504,6 @@ #### Key Flags
shorter than an implementation expects, the unstated flags are
considered to be zero. The defined flags are as follows:
-Defined features are as follows:
-
First octet:
0x01 - This key may be used to certify other keys.
@@ -1527,6 +1525,8 @@ #### Key Flags
Second octet:
0x04 - This key may be used as an additional decryption subkey (ADSK).
+
+ 0x08 - This key may be used for timestamping.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
pgpTlUs3Lp9UG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp