I thought we were only left with a mailing list without a WG... ;-)
In any case, could the consistency checks can be done by the authors and RFC
editors instead?
On Dec 4, 2018, at 12:58 AM, Derek Atkins
<derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com<mailto:derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com>> wrote:
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu<mailto:kaduk(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu>>
writes:
Most of the pain of 8447 was on the WG chairs and AD to manually do
consistency checks. I don't expect much of an efficiency gain from
practice, but I suppose there are probably ways to distribute the work that
we did not explore very well for 8447.
And we don't have a WG chair here.......
-Ben
-derek
--
Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com<mailto:derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com>
www.ihtfp.com<http://www.ihtfp.com>
Computer and Internet Security Consultant
_____________________________________
Ronald Tse
Ribose Inc.
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp