On Fri, February 5, 2021 4:07 pm, Michael Richardson wrote:
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg(_at_)fifthhorseman(_dot_)net> wrote:
> On Fri 2021-01-29 11:59:31 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> The -00 document is just the re-generated version of RFC4880. The
only
>> changes are the updated boilerplate and generating code differences
of
>> the xml tools over the years, as well as the document author, role
and
>> name/time of the draft.
> Thanks for this, Paul!
>> You can see the diff with RFC4880 using this url:
>>
>>
https://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4880.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-00.txt
Looks good to me.
Some significant pagination differences later on, but the text all looks
consistent.
Ditto. The ToC doesn't include anything beyond x.y.z, and there is some
differences in text wrapping and pagination, but I don't see any content
differences.
> I've proposed some document editing workflow clarifications over on
> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/31,
including
> an ephemeral section (to be removed when we make it to an RFC) that
> describes how to collaborate on the document.
Good.
I have no objection to this merge.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins 617-623-3745
derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com www.ihtfp.com
Computer and Internet Security Consultant
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp