Re: [openpgp] [RFC4880bis PATCH] Clarify CRC-24 C example implementation

On Wed 2021-03-17 10:55:08 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> The mismatch between the variable in the sample CRC-24 generation code
> and the definition of the generator in the paragraph above has been a
> source of confusion for over 20 years.
I recorded this proposed minor cleanup as MR 39:
https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/39

        --dkg

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp