Re: [openpgp] [RFC4880bis PATCH] Clarify CRC-24 C example implementation

On 2021-03-17 at 11:05 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2021-03-17 10:55:08 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > The mismatch between the variable in the sample CRC-24 generation
> > code
> > and the definition of the generator in the paragraph above has been
> > a
> > source of confusion for over 20 years.
> I recorded this proposed minor cleanup as MR 39:
> https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/39
>
>         --dkg
What about using, instead of the 'long' type, which may mean quite
dfferent things, the uint_least32_t type defined in ISO C 7.18 ?


_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp