Great question, it is one that I have been asking
and still waiting for an answer. Who has a 1.0
implementation that conforms to the standard?
For all the other implementations, what are the
delta's and plans for conforming?
..................................................
Joe Lindsay
CTO
eBuilt Inc.
2652 McGaw
Irvine, CA, 92614
Voice: (949) 609-0000
Fax: (949) 609-0001
Mail: mailto:jlindsay(_at_)eBuilt(_dot_)com
Web: http://www.eBuilt.com
.................................................
-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Hofmann [mailto:hofmann(_at_)bell-labs(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Duggs, Lee; comments(_at_)akamai(_dot_)com;
pwg(_at_)catarina(_dot_)usc(_dot_)edu
Cc: Markus Hofmann
Subject: Re: Urgent: Your presence is requested at the 2nd Annual iCAP
Forum on January 25th
Hi,
this is from an announcement for the next iCAP Forum meeting:
"As an open standard architecture, iCAP provides, for the first time,
a non-proprietary and simple scheme for Internet caching servers [...]
to communicate with application and content servers [...]"
An open, non-proprietary standard is only useful if there are
implementations that comply to that standard 100% - no "dialects,
flavors or modifications" of that standard. Different implemenations
have to interoperate with each other, no proprietary "features". This
can best be shown through open interoperaibilty tests.
My question - who has currently implemented the open standard
according to the current Version 1.0? Who has a "flavor" of it and who
has an older Version, such as 0.9?
Thanks,
Markus
Joe Lindsay (E-mail).vcf
Description: Binary data