Hi,
---------------------------------------------
Issue No 4:
How exactly do we resolve the conflict in Rule Base?
Rule base should be designed in such a way that only the relevant part of the
rule base is considered for rule matching .
---------------------------------------------
Step 9:
.......add new headers ......
I think , there should be only modification of headers and no addition.If
rule
base is based on N headers , then property set should contain all those N
headers . If that header value couldn't be obtained from message , then that
can
be considered as NULL , which can be later modified .
---------------------------------------------
Issue regarding ICAP service call .
Modification of header values in case of local proxlets can be done using
library functions and hence property set can be modified reliably . But in
case
of ICAP service calls , there should be some way of informing the OPES
environment , that few properties can be modified .Can we provide this
information in Rule File ( XML file ) along with the "action" field .
Comments Welcome .
Rajnish