Markus --
I think both your example and the example mentioned by Dave are very good in
illustrating the use of the "modified headers" into the rule engine loop. I
myself also see that as a powerful feature to have.
Lily
-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Hofmann [mailto:hofmann(_at_)bell-labs(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 10:41 AM
To: Dave Reynolds
Cc: ietf-openproxy(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: some suggestions for IRML
Dave,
The example you mentioned also is a nice example in which the rule
engine has to operate on modified headers rather than always on the
original ones. If the first rule matches and the associated action
adds one of the user defined headers you mentioned, the next rule
match should be done against the modified header, and NOT the original
one.
-Markus