ietf-openproxy
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: issues on IRML & rule processing for OPES

2001-06-12 16:23:57

Micah -- I don't understand what you mean here. I thought allowing
late-binding actually free the end-users from having to know exactly what
piece of code to run where. You seem to think the other way?
Lily

-----Original Message-----
From: Micah Beck [mailto:mbeck(_at_)cs(_dot_)utk(_dot_)edu]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:54 AM
To: Yang, Lily L; ietf-openproxy(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Cc: Andre Beck (E-mail); hofmann(_at_)bell-labs(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: issues on IRML & rule processing for OPES

5) Currently IRML supports only static and exact action 
binding in the
<action> element. It is proposed that late and flexible (or 
not-exact)
action binding might also be desirable. How can IRML 
facilitate both? In
another word, how can we allow people to say "do exactly 
this translation
service by this vendor at this location", or "just do 
whatever virus scan
you have".

This is no longer a rule-based service, it is end-user programming.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>