I was referring to intellectual property issues. Might be a moot point here,
but it would be good to state it.
I don't see the value of making a permanent document out of
the spec before it clearly results in interoperable implementations.
Hilarie
Jeremy Elson <jelson(_at_)ISI(_dot_)EDU> 06/05/01 02:16PM >>>
"Hilarie Orman" writes:
It depends on the wording in the Informational.
Can you describe in more detail what you mean? Is there something
specific we should avoid saying? (Or something we should make sure to
say?)