On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Alex Rousskov wrote:
regarding services: The usage examples do not convince me that
changing of services will be needed
I agree that my examples were not very convincing. Let me try to come
up with a few better/different ones:
[.....]
What do you think? Does this address your concerns?
Very good argumentation, Alex.
I do (now) agree with your findings.
Do you think a services-for-images and services-for-executables
example is valid/common enough?
Was there an example with images and executables services in your
message?
Do you think that OCP MUST work over a single transport connection?
It's a nice example; not sure whether we will find it in real world,
but I do now agree that we should be prepared for this scenario.
Regards
Martin