Re: what-parts-to-send-or-skip

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Martin Stecher wrote:

> > Wont-Look-Body: 2147483647
> > rather than
> > Wont-Send-Body: 2147483647
> It will be
>
> Wont-Look-Body: 0
Agreed. Wont-Send offset semantics (will not send anything up to the
specified point) is going to be different from the Wont-Look semantics
(will not look at anything beyond the specified point). Right?

I hope that is OK. If not, we can have more explicit names:

        Wont-Look-Body-After:
        Wont-Send-Body-Before:

or something of that kind.

Alex.