[Forwarded email from Alex, who currently has problems posting to the
OPES list].
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2005/01/09 (MST), <markus(_at_)mhof(_dot_)com> wrote:
Alex Rousskov wrote:
Personally, I need to respond to Markus' call regarding desirable
features that Seive cannot support. I mentioned a couple in my
original comparison, but need to double check those and look for more,
given the new Sieve extension framework.
Alex - do you think you'll get a chance any time sooo?
Everyone - this is not just an issue that Alex should take on, eberyone
is invited to dig into the Sieve extensions and provide his/her opinion
and thoughts.
I did not see anybody digging in. At this point, I have to wonder if I am
the only person left interested in the "common rules language" problem.
Did we lose the momentum and interest on this topic? Does it make sense to
continue working on rules (regardless of Seive versus P question)?
There were a few folks interested in the topic when the charter was
discussed and before various (mostly IETF-imposed) delays put the topic on
the backburner. Should we assume that those folks lost interest (due to
delays or any other reason)?
We should probably discuss this question during the upcoming face-to-face
meeting (I will not be in Minneapolis though).
Thank you,
Alex.
--- End Message ---