Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area

FYI. On IETF main.

At 23:05 19/09/2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> I guess I would go for "Low Latency Applications and Infrastucture " 
> (LLAI) myself.
Do you conceptually accept in that wording that an OPES can be 
plugged in there, for example as part of a service to the exchange? 
The WG-OPES has worked on HTTP, and now on SMTP. IMHO OPES also fit 
pseudo-synchronous exchanges. In that case the WG-OPES should be able 
to dialog with the new area at a later stage.
jfc