JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
FYI. On IETF main.
At 23:05 19/09/2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I guess I would go for "Low Latency Applications and Infrastucture "
(LLAI) myself.
Do you conceptually accept in that wording that an OPES can be plugged
in there, for example as part of a service to the exchange? The WG-OPES
has worked on HTTP, and now on SMTP. IMHO OPES also fit
pseudo-synchronous exchanges. In that case the WG-OPES should be able to
dialog with the new area at a later stage.
jfc
Conceptually, the OPES framework could also be applied to "real-time
applications" - at an earlier stage, we discussed applicability to RTP,
for example.
-Markus