[Top] [All Lists]

What's wrong with this format??

1997-04-18 02:50:37

cbreed(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com said:
The IETF S/MIME Working Group is chartered with defining a  standard
method to send and receive secure MIME messages  that interoperate
globally.  The group will place particular  emphasis on the need for
strong cryptography based on open and publicly available algorithms.

If this is the charter, what is wrong with the format of this mail?
That is RFC2015? 

Can't that be used as a MUST profile or do you all feel that it is too
PGP specific (althoug this IS the international standard of use today!)

I don't quite see why someting like RFC2015 or other relatives to RFC1847
can't be used?



Frederik H. Andersen            Phone:  +45 42 84 50 11           
Dansk Data Elektronik A/S       Fax:    +45 42 84 52 20           
Herlev Hovedgade 199            Email:  fha(_at_)dde(_dot_)dk (MIME accepted)
DK-2730 Herlev, DENMARK
PGP Fingerprint:  6B BC FB 45 E4 69 CE A2  63 E1 62 1F 0C 65 C2 E4


Attachment: pgp3Qlkn1IGXE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • What's wrong with this format??, Frederik H. Andersen <=