So how about making it a CHOICE { Name, [0] GeneralName }??
/ Rich
----------
From: Scott Hollenbeck <hollenbe(_at_)east(_dot_)xsis(_dot_)xerox(_dot_)com>
To: 'John Pawling' <jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com>
Cc: 'IETF S/MIME' <ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Subject: RE: CMS-01 SignerInfo and Attribute Certificates
Date: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 11:59 AM
-----Original Message-----
From: John Pawling [SMTP:jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 1997 10:52 AM
To: Scott Hollenbeck; 'IETF S/MIME'
Subject: Re: CMS-01 SignerInfo and Attribute Certificates
Scott,
The simple substitution of GeneralNames for Name in IsuerAndSerialNumber
will break backwards compatibility with PKCS #7 v1.5.
[SAH] Yes, it will, but I don't think the current spec is workable
as written. How do you map a non-Name GeneralNames choice to a Name?