Re: The address-in-certs issue

The S/MIME working group charter says that we are going to use the PKIX
certificate infrastructure.  To this end, we should use the subjectAltName
to carry an rfc822Name if an e-mail address is desired in the certificate.

Russ

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
The address-in-certs issue, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: The address-in-certs issue, Anil R. Gangolli Re: The address-in-certs issue, Russ Housley <= Re: The address-in-certs issue, Elliott N Ginsburg Re: The address-in-certs issue, David P. Kemp Re: The address-in-certs issue, Paul Hoffman / IMC Re: The address-in-certs issue, John Gardiner Myers Re: The address-in-certs issue, Elliott N Ginsburg Re: The address-in-certs issue, John Gardiner Myers Re: The address-in-certs issue, Elliott N Ginsburg RE: The address-in-certs issue, Ron Craswell Re: The address-in-certs issue, John Pettitt Re: The address-in-certs issue, Stefan Kelm

Previous by Date:	RE: draft-ietf-smime-cert, Russ Housley
Next by Date:	RE: Modifications to ESS document, Russ Housley
Previous by Thread:	Re: The address-in-certs issue, Anil R. Gangolli
Next by Thread:	Re: The address-in-certs issue, Elliott N Ginsburg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]