Re: CMS Critical flag for signed attributes?

At 12:33 PM 1/2/98 -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> I agree, but I want to make sure that the resulting wording makes a
> critical attribute something that can be raised in court as something
> a recipient should have made themselves aware of before relying on the
> document as an agreement.
Boy, I'd like to see some suggested wording for this. This doesn't sound
like typical wording for IETF specifications, does it? :-)


--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium