ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CMS Critical flag for signed attributes?

1998-01-05 15:00:55
Phill:

By your definition, I do not think that any of the attributes that have
been defined would be marked critical.

Russ


At 12:25 PM 12/31/97 -0800, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Should there be a criticallity flag for signed attributes?

The application I am thiniking of is limiting an employees signing
authority inside a company. An obvious way to do this would be to have
an OID for the signed attribute 'this message does not constitute an
offer or acceptance of a contract'.

The problem is forcing the client to bring this (or a like) OID to the
attention of the reader.

It seems to me we may just need a critical flag just like there is in
the X.509v3 certificate. If the critical bit is set and the client does
not understand the semantics of the attribute a client is required to
inform the user of the fact.

Alternatively one could suggest making all extensions critical in which
case I am sure I can think up an example of a need to flag something
non-critical!


              Phill