ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The address-in-certs issue

1998-01-06 15:05:19
Bill Barry wrote:
Sorting out the above statement I get (and agree with) these goals:

Goal 1 - Long lived stable identities/certs (i.e. like a S.S. number)

I certainly don't want to advertise my S.S. number or anything as stable
as my S.S. number on the net, for privacy reasons.

IMHO the dichotomy is clear; we cannot achieve all goals at the same time.
It is the issue of adding and/or editing addresses that would result in
an unstable certificate. I add my voice to those proposing that the
certificate not contain any address.

If you put anything that can change, such as a common name, into a cert,
you get an "unstable" certificate.
 
If we had some other form of permanent ID in our cyber world then I
would vote that we put it in the cert.  Ideally, a recipient would
only need one certificate for their entire life.

What would you suggest?  Employers change relatively frequently. 
Residence addresses change frequently.  State/country of residence
changes occasionally.  Even common names change occasionally, especially
for women.

Anything that is hard to change intentionally, such as a S.S. number, is
problemetic for privacy reasons.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>