Bill,
You wrote:
(2) Paragraph 1, line 10. Change "minimum
required"
to "maximum allowable". Rationale: to promote interoperability
despite the v3 extensions "curse," and so that verbiage agrees
with the first sentence in paragraph # 3.
I disagree with your comment because v3 certificate extensions in addition
to those listed in the S/MIME CERT I-D may be included in v3 certs used by
S/MIME apps.
(2) Final line. One-line paragraphs =
improper
grammar. Combine line with paragraph #1 or # 2. How should the
"basicConstraints extension be marked? "Critical" or...?
q. Section 4.4.3. How should the "subject
alternative
name extension" be marked?
I disagree with these comments. PKIX I answers these questions. The S/MIME
CERT I-D should not duplicate what is in PKIX I.
================================
John Pawling, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.
www.jgvandyke.com
================================