Then I suggest we relook at what applies and what does not, because if you
don't implement "reply-status" functionality such as in the RFC 2298, then
you are greatly reducing the applicability of S/MIME v3 for
application-to-application implementations. I-Ds are not authoritative
sources.... that is why they are called Internet-Drafts......and my
The best regards, Rik
From: John Pawling [SMTP:jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 1998 7:38 AM
To: Rik Drummond; 'ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org'
Subject: RE: Rethinking Receipt
The S/MIME v3 ESS I-D is the authoritative source for the syntax and
semantics of the ESS signed receipt. ESS is not implementing RFC 2298, so
your comments do not apply to this issue.
John Pawling, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.