Then I suggest we relook at what applies and what does not, because if you
don't implement "reply-status" functionality such as in the RFC 2298, then
you are greatly reducing the applicability of S/MIME v3 for
application-to-application implementations. I-Ds are not authoritative
sources.... that is why they are called Internet-Drafts......and my
comments apply....
The best regards, Rik
-----Original Message-----
From: John Pawling [SMTP:jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 1998 7:38 AM
To: Rik Drummond; 'ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org'
Subject: RE: Rethinking Receipt
Rik,
The S/MIME v3 ESS I-D is the authoritative source for the syntax and
semantics of the ESS signed receipt. ESS is not implementing RFC 2298, so
your comments do not apply to this issue.
================================
John Pawling, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.
www.jgvandyke.com
================================