[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Rethinking Receipt

1998-04-14 05:44:39
Then I suggest we relook at what applies and what does not, because if you 
don't implement "reply-status" functionality such as in the RFC 2298, then 
you are greatly reducing the applicability of S/MIME v3 for 
application-to-application implementations. I-Ds are not authoritative 
sources.... that is why they are called Internet-Drafts......and my 
comments apply....

The best regards, Rik

-----Original Message-----
From:   John Pawling [SMTP:jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com]
Sent:   Tuesday, April 14, 1998 7:38 AM
To:     Rik Drummond; 'ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org'
Subject:        RE: Rethinking Receipt


The S/MIME v3 ESS I-D is the authoritative source for the syntax and
semantics of the ESS signed receipt.  ESS is not implementing RFC 2298, so
your comments do not apply to this issue.

John Pawling, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>