Rik,
You are proposing to add a security service to ESS that is very different
than the services provided by the ESS signed receipt. I am not oppossed to
you proposing new features to be added to ESS. I am opposed to proposals
that overload the current ESS signed receipt concept and syntax. Please
re-formulate your proposal so that it is independent of the ESS signed
receipt concept and syntax.
================================
John Pawling, jsp(_at_)jgvandyke(_dot_)com
J.G. Van Dyke & Associates, Inc.
www.jgvandyke.com
================================
At 07:45 AM 4/14/98 -0500, Rik Drummond wrote:
Then I suggest we relook at what applies and what does not, because if you
don't implement "reply-status" functionality such as in the RFC 2298, then
you are greatly reducing the applicability of S/MIME v3 for
application-to-application implementations. I-Ds are not authoritative
sources.... that is why they are called Internet-Drafts......and my
comments apply....
The best regards, Rik