ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Comments on updated X9.42 draft

1998-11-08 21:35:54
Robert Zuccherato <robert(_dot_)zuccherato(_at_)entrust(_dot_)com> writes:

I have one further comment on the X9.42 draft.  Presently it states:
X9.42 requires that the private key x be in the interval [2^(m-1) + 1,
(q - 2)]. 

The latest (ballot) version of X9.42 actually only requires that private
keys be in the interval [2, q-2].  Restricting the key space to
[2^(m-1)+1, (q-2)] only results in a smaller key space, which is
(slightly) easier to attack.  There is no reason to restrict it like
this.
Works for me.

I took that restriction directly from an X9.42 draft. I'm perfectly
happy to relax it.
-Ekr

-- 
[Eric Rescorla                                   ekr(_at_)rtfm(_dot_)com]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>