Re: Comments on draft-ietf-smime-password-00

Peter:

> >1. Section 2.1.  What is the timing you expect to see relative to PKCS5v2
> >being advanced to an RFC of some type?
>
> I have no idea.  Does it need to be?  Like the other PKCS's I assume it can
> be turned into an RFC in no time, but is that a requirement?

If you want this on the standards track this will greatly ease progression.

Russ