ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Key Wrap Algorithms

2001-07-10 11:11:46
Mike:

In the current draft, support for the protocol elements is required, but no specific algorithm is required.  This inconsistency is the basis of my question.

Russ

At 02:06 PM 7/10/2001 -0400, Mike Just wrote:

Apologies Russ, but I'm not clear on exactly what you're stating below.  You're introductory text indicates that implementations MUST support key transport, key agreement and previously distributed key-encryption keys (PDKEK), but the table from the minutes you include below only indicates a MUST for key transport (using RSA PKCS#1 v1.5).  I would have assumed that only key transport MUST be implemented?  If key agreement and PDKEK MUST be implemented, I must admit that I didn't notice any consensus for this on the list.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Housley, Russ [mailto:rhousley(_at_)rsasecurity(_dot_)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:51 PM
> To: ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
> Subject: Key Wrap Algorithms
>
>
>
> All:
>
> After a fairly long debate, the consensus on key management has been
> reached.  We seem to agree that:
>
>     Implementations MUST support key transport, key
> agreement, and previously
>     distributed symmetric key-encryption keys, as represented
> by ktri,
> kari, and
>     kekri, respectively.  Implementations MAY support the
> password-based key
>     management as represented by pwri.  Implementations MAY
> support any other
>     key management technique as represented by ori.
>
> At the last IETF meeting, we agreed on the mandatory to implement
> algorithms.  The Minutes say:
>
>     Signature: DSA and RSA (PKCS #1 v1.5) as per Russ' proposal
>     Message digest: SHA-1
>     Key Management: RSA (PKCS #1 v1.5)
>     Encryption: Triple-DES
>
> But, the Minutes are silent about key wrapping.
>
> It is my view that we should require implementations to
> support Triple-DES
> Key Wrap.  This view is reflected in
> draft-ietf-smime-cmsalg-00. And, I
> think that this approach will facilitate the adoption of mail lists.
>
> I want to hear from others.  What do you think is the best
> MUST and SHOULD
> statements regarding key wrap algorithms?
>
> Russ
>
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>