Sreeramulu.D,
I don't think I am familiar with the class hierarchy to which you are
referring. However, if I'm guessing correctly based on the names (always a
haphazard way to do business) it sounds like the OMP_O_MH_C_GENERAL_CONTENT
class would be appropriate. I assume that OMP_O_IM_C_INTERPERSONAL_MSG and
OMP_O_MH_C_GENERAL_CONTENT are polymorphic class definitions that be used
interchangably when submitting a message to the MTS.
Am I on the right track here?
Regards,
Chris B.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org]On
Behalf Of Sreeramulu, Diguvapalem
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 01:22
To: 'ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org'
Subject: Doubt in IETF draft, "Securing X.400 Content".
Hi,
This is Sreeramulu.D. working for Digital GlobalSoft Ltd, a subsidiary of
Hewlette-Packard co.,U.S.A. Currently we are working on sending s/mime
mssages in b/n Internet and X.400. This mail is regarding the IETF draft,
"Securing X.400 content". I have a scenario in which I have to send a
secured X.400 content to an internet user. What is an OM_class (like
OMP_O_IM_C_INTERPERSONAL_MSG),to create a content object from? Or otherwise
can we put the protected X.400 content in an oject of an OM_class,
OMP_O_MH_C_GENERAL_CONTENT and send it across?
Hope you could understand my problem. Hoping an elaborated reply from you as
soon as possible.
Thanks&Regards,
Sreeramulu.D
Mailbus Engineering,
Digital GlobalSoft Ltd.,
INDIA.