-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Paul
Hoffman / IMC
Sent: Saturday, June 14, 2003 10:51 AM
To: ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Making AES a SHOULD in draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis?
Do we want to add AES as a SHOULD in section 2.7? We have the
traditional TripleDES MUST and RC2-40 as SHOULD. That's looking
backwards (some might say "very backwards" for RC2-40). It might be
good to add a forwards-looking SHOULD, namely AES.
How do others feel about this?
I wouldn't cry if we did this. Does that help?
Blake