The RFC Editor sent me a reply that processing errata was very low
priority. Since this one is incorrect in one place, but correct in many
others (especially in the ASN.1 module), I do not think implementors will
At 06:37 AM 2/1/2005, Blake Ramsdell wrote:
Jim Schaad wrote:
I have found a minor typo in RFC 3852.
Russ, this sounds like another edit you should submit to the RFC Editor
since you've already got a bunch of edits queued up. I think it's pretty
minor, as it is an informative reference in the section with the error,
and the normative references are correct.
Blake Ramsdell | Sendmail, Inc. | http://www.sendmail.com