On Jan 13, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
This has lead to very little discussion. I am pleased to propose
the text for CMS if that is the direction that the S/MIME WG wants
to pursue. Please pick a direction. We need to get moving.
OK, well I guess I'm picking it. Russ, please propose some text for
this in CMS, per Jim's option 1 below. The path here seems to be
reopening CMS for the purpose of adding this clarification.
Multiple signatures will be on the agenda for IETF 65.
At 05:09 PM 12/4/2005, Jim Schaad wrote:
1) CMS Base specification
Pro:
- This is core functionality and it would be seen
by all
implementers of CMS
- It would deal with ALL CMS objects
Con:
- The document is not currently open for changes
- Depending on how it is written, it might be more
open to
changes in the future
Blake
--
Blake Ramsdell | Sendmail, Inc. | http://www.sendmail.com