ietf-smime
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-cms-auth-enveloped-03.txt

2007-05-11 11:38:31

This might require that an algorithm registration indicates which one they'd
use.  Unless of course, this is just an efficiency thing and it wouldn't
error out.

spt

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:owner-ietf-smime(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Peter 
Gutmann
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:41 AM
To: Peter(_dot_)Sylvester(_at_)EdelWeb(_dot_)fr; 
pgut001(_at_)cs(_dot_)auckland(_dot_)ac(_dot_)nz
Cc: housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com; ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org; 
ietf(_at_)augustcellars(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-cms-auth-enveloped-03.txt


Peter Sylvester <Peter(_dot_)Sylvester(_at_)edelweb(_dot_)fr> writes:

I would like to repeat my suggestion to have two fields, one 
before and 
one behind.

Sounds good to me.

Peter.