[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [smime] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)

2012-09-19 22:31:25
I would make it

Corrected Text
   3) Output the results.

       Set C[0] = A[s]
       For i = 1 to n
           C[i] = R[s][i]

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul(_dot_)hoffman(_at_)vpnc(_dot_)org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:11 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: rhousley(_at_)rsasecurity(_dot_)com; 
stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie; turners(_at_)ieca(_dot_)com;
blaker(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com; dlitz(_at_)dlitz(_dot_)net; 
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)

On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" 

As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected.

I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3
the value of t might not be well defined, however

1.  the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be
redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both
locations that it occurs.

So, you have an alternate errata to propose?

--Paul Hoffman

smime mailing list