Oh, good catch. I saw R[t] but missed A[t]. Sorry about that.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 08:29:47PM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote:
I would make it
Corrected Text
--------------
3) Output the results.
Set C[0] = A[s]
For i = 1 to n
C[i] = R[s][i]
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hoffman [mailto:paul(_dot_)hoffman(_at_)vpnc(_dot_)org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 11:11 AM
To: Jim Schaad
Cc: rhousley(_at_)rsasecurity(_dot_)com;
stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie; turners(_at_)ieca(_dot_)com;
blaker(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com; dlitz(_at_)dlitz(_dot_)net;
smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3394 (3358)
On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:41 AM, "Jim Schaad" <jimsch(_at_)augustcellars(_dot_)com>
wrote:
> As it stands I would say that this errata needs to be rejected.
>
>
> I accept the basic premise of the errata, that when you start step 3
> the value of t might not be well defined, however
>
> 1. the value of s is well defined and therefore does not need to be
> redefined, and 2. the value of t needs to be replaced with s in both
> locations that it occurs.
So, you have an alternate errata to propose?
--Paul Hoffman
--
Dwayne C. Litzenberger <dlitz(_at_)dlitz(_dot_)net>
OpenPGP: 19E1 1FE8 B3CF F273 ED17 4A24 928C EC13 39C2 5CF7
_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime