On 13 Aug 2016, at 10:03, Jim Schaad wrote:
The first half of this errata must be rejected. We do not change the ASN.1
for something like this under just about any circumstances.
Changing the recommendation of a value should probably not be done by an
erratum but by publishing a new document. We could make discuss and make
the recommendation change in the new S/MIME document in the LAMPS group
rather than in this document.
I fully agree with Jim on both counts.
smime mailing list