On Aug 27, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Peter Gutmann
<pgut001(_at_)cs(_dot_)auckland(_dot_)ac(_dot_)nz> wrote:
Russ Housley <housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com> writes:
Wow, this has gone a very long time without anyone noticing. As far as I can
tell, it have not resulted in any implementation errors.
Has it resulted in any implementations?
(That's a serious question. What actually uses X9.42 DH, rather than PKCS #3
DH? That is, I know that some standards reference that RFC, but what actually
implements it and uses it in the real world?).
I am aware of an implementation that was done 17 or 18 years ago. I do not
know if it is still being used.
Russ
_______________________________________________
smime mailing list
smime(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/smime