[Top] [All Lists]

Re: vacation replies to From: or envelope from

2001-04-03 06:03:12
There is no such citation of which I am aware.

Personally, I agree with the choice of responding to the message From:
header as opposed to the envelope from.  The message From: header is the
author of the content of the message and if that content is "urgent" in
any way, I would want that person to know I am not being timely.

In any case, I don't think the primary issue is where to respond but
rather when to respond.  A response should only be created when the
address of the recipient appears in either the message To: or Cc:

Of course, either set of rules means that certain mailing list softare
habits are, shall we say, unorthodox.  I am often confounded by which
set of rules is really the lesser of two evils, since at this point
neither is a clear winner.


On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Dan Wing wrote:

    Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 16:19:25 -0700
    From: Dan Wing <dwing(_at_)Cisco(_dot_)COM>
    To: ietf-smtp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
    Subject: vacation replies to From: or envelope from
    Our IT group here has recently installed a product which supports a
    vacation-like feature, but it replies to the From: field instead of the
    envelope from (MAIL FROM).
    Does anyone know of a cite for recommended behavior with autoreply
    vacation-like programs.  I checked several RFCs I expected to have such a
    cite, but couldn't find anything authoritative.
    -Dan Wing