RE: Spam prevention gone too far?

Keith Moore wrote:
> As for the problem of inappropriate bouncing of mail - I do think it
> might be useful to write an RFC documenting dubious practices,
> such as refusing mail with a null return-path, expecting the mail
> to come from a client machine with the same name as the sender's 
> domain, trusting blacklists, etc.
See RFC 2505 - "Anti-Spam Recommendations for SMTP MTAs".

Daryl Odnert
Tumbleweed Communications
daryl(_dot_)odnert(_at_)tumbleweed(_dot_)com