On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:41:36 CDT, "Eric A. Hall" said:
Valdis(_dot_)Kletnieks(_at_)vt(_dot_)edu wrote:
hand-specify the undocumented _USE_DEPRECATED_ROUTE_ADDR_ option when
building the config file)....
Do you know what happens after that? Is it host-specific (strict) or does
the next-hop go through the routing agent (loose)?
Well, *if* you supply the undocumented option, it rewrites as follows:
@routehost:user(_at_)node -> user%node(_at_)routehost
I'm a bit too fuzzy-brained at the moment to be able to understand the .cf
majic enough to guess whether @host1,@host2:user(_at_)node ends up as
user%node%host1(_at_)host2 or user%node%host2(_at_)host1(_dot_) In any case,
the source
route ends up as the RHS of a %-hack...
Now this will be strictly routed to whatever ends up on the RHS of
the '@' *in the absence of mailertables* and other re-writing that happens
after that. Once it's beaten into a %-hack format, it's still subject to
other, site-defined, rerouting.
/Valdis
pgpTSxrlFW0Mn.pgp
Description: PGP signature