Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions.

On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:16:29 EST, Keith Moore said:

> more to the point, this looks like a bug in RFC 2821 - I'm pretty sure that
> the intent is that clients MUST NOT use extensions that are not asserted
> by the server in its EHLO response.  something for the errata page?
Works for me... If Keith's agreeing with me that it looks like a possible
errata, I'll wordsmith one up tonight-ish....

pgpPt2lqckaXV.pgp
Description: PGP signature