Re: message-identifiers vs. "new message" in draft-crocker-email-arch-04

> > [Tony:] Though the id item in Received: fields is not necessarily a Message-ID; 
> > it may also be an MTA's queue ID.
> >    
> [Bruce:] If we're talking about architecture as designed, the Received field as 
> defined in RFC 822 absolutely requires a msg-id, complete with local-part, '@', 
> domain, and angle brackets.
The syntax element in the Message-ID field and in the Received field is 
defined as a msg-id, but the msg-id in the Received field and the msg-id 
in the Message-ID field aren't the same value.
<csg>