Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes.2005-05-10 11:17:25On Tue May 10 2005 11:39, Markus Stumpf wrote: My version of the RFC says (like yours): This is useful only as a permanent error. Which is equivalent to saying -- with or without RFC 2119 -- that success (2) and temporary failure (4) in conjunction with the remainder of the code is *not* useful.
|
|