[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes.

2005-05-10 11:17:25

On Tue May 10 2005 11:39, Markus Stumpf wrote:

My version of the RFC says (like yours):

   This is useful only as a permanent error.

Which is equivalent to saying -- with or without RFC 2119 -- that
success (2) and temporary failure (4) in conjunction with the
remainder of the code is *not* useful.