IETF SMTP (date)
May 31, 2005
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 20:27
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 19:07
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos, 16:26
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos, 15:49
- Is it really FUD? [Re: "Header Reordering", yet again], Hector Santos, 15:10
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos, 13:45
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 13:33
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 13:32
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos, 13:26
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos, 13:22
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Robert A. Rosenberg, 13:01
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann, 12:32
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 12:16
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, william(at)elan.net, 11:37
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 10:33
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 10:16
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:06
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 09:46
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 09:34
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:05
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:03
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann, 08:24
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:41
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Paul Smith, 07:41
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:20
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 07:08
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos, 07:06
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Paul Smith, 06:10
- Re: MTAMARK, Frank Ellermann, 05:39
May 30, 2005
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:16
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Robert A. Rosenberg, 20:36
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Robert A. Rosenberg, 20:36
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Bruce Lilly, 18:19
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Markus Stumpf, 13:40
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, David MacQuigg, 12:41
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, David MacQuigg, 12:26
May 29, 2005
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, Robert A. Rosenberg, 20:12
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, John Leslie, 18:29
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:52
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:11
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:07
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann, 07:59
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann, 07:14
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, David MacQuigg, 03:14
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, David MacQuigg, 02:35
May 28, 2005
- Re: Chain of Trusted Forwarders, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:47
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Dave Crocker, 21:46
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, John Leslie, 17:59
- Chain of Trusted Forwarders, David MacQuigg, 16:45
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:49
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 13:39
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 13:23
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 13:05
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 11:36
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 11:06
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 10:47
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 10:41
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 10:26
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 10:17
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:33
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:10
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 08:52
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Dave Crocker, 00:41
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 00:40
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 00:40
May 27, 2005
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 20:44
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 20:09
- Certified Server Validation (was: "CSV" [not comma-separated values]), Frank Ellermann, 19:07
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 17:39
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 17:05
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 16:12
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 15:50
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 15:28
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:44
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Paul Smith, 13:30
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 12:39
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:56
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Paul Smith, 11:50
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], wayne, 11:23
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Bruce Lilly, 10:27
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], ned+ietf-smtp, 10:16
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:51
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:42
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:33
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:26
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 08:15
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp, 08:02
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg, 07:08
May 26, 2005
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], ned+ietf-smtp, 12:00
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Tony Finch, 10:53
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Bruce Lilly, 10:16
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 09:27
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 08:08
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 08:06
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 07:13
- Re: message-identifiers vs. "new message" in draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Tony Finch, 06:49
- Re: message-identifiers vs. "new message" in draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Frank Ellermann, 06:20
- Re: "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Tony Finch, 03:55
- Re: message-identifiers vs. "new message" in draft-crocker-email-arch-04.txt, Dave Crocker, 00:13
May 25, 2005
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 21:18
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, John C Klensin, 19:49
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Hector Santos, 13:19
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 13:01
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 13:00
- "CSV" [not comma-separated values], Bruce Lilly, 12:42
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 12:15
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 12:13
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 12:13
- LMAP systems, wayne, 11:45
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 11:39
- Re: MTAMARK etc., Frank Ellermann, 10:54
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Tony Finch, 10:47
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Paul Smith, 10:44
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:31
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Bruce Lilly, 10:28
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 10:20
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 10:06
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 09:34
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 08:26
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 08:15
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Tony Finch, 07:35
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 07:00
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 06:25
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 06:15
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 06:08
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 05:57
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 05:42
- Re: MTAMARK etc., Bruce Lilly, 05:06
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Bruce Lilly, 04:35
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 04:17
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 04:08
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 04:05
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Tony Finch, 02:43
May 24, 2005
- Re: proposed Received-SPF trace header, wayne, 22:52
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 22:41
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 22:33
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 22:28
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 22:24
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 21:35
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 14:49
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Bruce Lilly, 14:40
- Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Markus Stumpf, 13:43
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:38
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 12:55
- Re: misdirected bounces, Bruce Lilly, 12:40
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 12:23
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 12:04
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:15
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 10:17
- Re: misdirected bounces (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), ned+ietf-smtp, 10:09
- Re: misdirected bounces (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Bruce Lilly, 09:46
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 09:32
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 09:25
- Re: misdirected bounces (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), John Leslie, 09:10
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, John Leslie, 08:50
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, John Leslie, 08:32
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 07:09
May 23, 2005
- Re: misdirected bounces (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Markus Stumpf, 19:06
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, Tony Finch, 15:23
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Markus Stumpf, 13:42
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 13:33
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 11:50
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:47
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, John Leslie, 11:44
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Hector Santos, 10:20
- "Envelope", yet again, Bruce Lilly, 10:05
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 09:37
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Markus Stumpf, 09:13
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 09:00
- Re: proposed Received-SPF trace header, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:37
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 08:22
- proposed Received-SPF trace header, John Leslie, 07:30
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, John Leslie, 06:47
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 01:30
May 22, 2005
- Intended status (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt), Frank Ellermann, 23:46
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 21:28
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, wayne, 20:56
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 20:01
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 15:53
- Re: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Bruce Lilly, 14:21
May 18, 2005
- Declaration of Identity - Ready for Submission, David MacQuigg, 16:22
- Re: Options for the ID Command, David MacQuigg, 07:46
- Re: Options for the ID Command, Valdis . Kletnieks, 05:52
- Re: Options for the ID Command, Hector Santos, 04:56
- Re: Options for the ID Command, David MacQuigg, 01:23
May 17, 2005
- Re: Options for the ID Command, Valdis . Kletnieks, 22:08
- Re: Options for the ID Command, David MacQuigg, 19:24
- Re: Options for the ID Command, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:47
- Re: Options for the ID command, David MacQuigg, 18:46
- Re: Options for the ID Command, David MacQuigg, 18:25
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:24
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, wayne, 18:05
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, wayne, 17:44
- Re: Options for the ID Command, Valdis . Kletnieks, 17:27
- Re: Who will lead the fight for email authentication, David MacQuigg, 17:22
- Re: Options for the ID Command, David MacQuigg, 16:41
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Hector Santos, 16:31
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:51
- Re: Who will lead the fight for email authentication, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:42
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:42
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:32
- Re: Options for the ID Command, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:12
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 15:08
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 15:06
- Who will lead the fight for email authentication, David MacQuigg, 15:00
- Options for the ID Command, David MacQuigg, 14:55
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Hector Santos, 14:18
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:06
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Hector Santos, 12:25
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:21
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 12:06
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Hector Santos, 11:30
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:27
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:19
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Hector Santos, 10:50
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Keith Moore, 10:02
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 09:58
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 09:44
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:08
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Bruce Lilly, 08:44
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 08:06
- RE: Authentication by Prior Arrangement, David MacQuigg, 07:11
- Re: Backward compatible SMTP extensions, Bruce Lilly, 04:59
- RE: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Bruce Lilly, 04:54
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Bruce Lilly, 04:20
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, Hector Santos, 04:09
- Re: Sender's Declaration of Identity, David MacQuigg, 03:13
- Authentication by Prior Arrangement, David MacQuigg, 03:13
May 13, 2005
- Re: Early history and 2821 (was: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt), Keith Moore, 08:46
- Re: Early history and 2821, Frank Ellermann, 04:56
- Re: Early history and 2821 (was: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt), Hector Santos, 04:25
- Early history and 2821 (was: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt), Frank Ellermann, 03:50
- Re: error in RFC2821 "section 2.4.1", Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:11
- Re: error in RFC2821 "section 2.4.1", Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:08
- Re: error in RFC2821 "section 2.4.1", Valdis . Kletnieks, 00:51
- error in RFC2821 "section 2.4.1", wayne, 00:13
May 12, 2005
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:26
- Re: About TURN and ETRN command, Paul Smith, 05:40
- Re: About TURN and ETRN command, Bruce Lilly, 05:17
- About TURN and ETRN command, Vijayan, 04:17
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:47
- Re: HELO/EHLO questions [was Re: New guy to this list..], Robert A. Rosenberg, 00:23
May 11, 2005
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, John C Klensin, 13:14
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 12:22
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, David Hagel, 12:15
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Zhenhai Duan, 12:05
- Re: Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Zhenhai Duan, 11:51
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, David hagel, 11:48
- Re: [SPAM] - Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt - Email found in subject, Zhenhai Duan, 11:46
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:41
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Zhenhai Duan, 11:29
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, John C Klensin, 11:02
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, David hagel, 10:43
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 08:35
- HELO/EHLO questions [was Re: New guy to this list..], Hector Santos, 08:13
- Re: New guy to this list.., John C Klensin, 07:26
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Hector Santos, 07:17
- New guy to this list.., Vijayan, 06:44
May 10, 2005
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Kartik Gopalan, 19:50
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 16:16
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Kartik Gopalan, 15:27
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Tony Finch, 13:54
- Re: Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Zhenhai Duan, 13:04
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, John C Klensin, 12:59
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Markus Stumpf, 12:50
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Kartik Gopalan, 12:42
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Bruce Lilly, 11:17
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Markus Stumpf, 08:39
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Hector Santos, 08:18
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Markus Stumpf, 08:06
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Tony Finch, 07:52
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Hector Santos, 07:44
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, John C Klensin, 05:06
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Tony Finch, 03:07
May 09, 2005
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Kartik Gopalan, 21:52
- Re: draft-duan-smtp-receiver-driven-00.txt, Tony Finch, 14:19
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Bruce Lilly, 13:12
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:56
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:27
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., SM, 11:11
- RE: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Bruce Lilly, 10:16
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Hector Santos, 09:20
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Hector Santos, 08:41
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Claus Assmann, 08:20
- RE: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg), 08:15
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:10
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., John Leslie, 07:58
- Re: RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:35
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:26
- RFC3463, 450 reply codes, and 4.7.1 extended codes., Valdis . Kletnieks, 06:57
May 04, 2005
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Markus Stumpf, 12:45
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 11:43
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Bruce Lilly, 11:02
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 10:16
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, Arun Sankar, 09:30
- Re: deja vu: draft-grandhi-pc-smtp-00.txt, willemien, 03:31