Re: "Header Reordering", yet again


On Tue May 31 2005 15:51, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:

Or link them by having the ID field from the Received Header 
replicated in the Received-SPF Header.


Been there, discussed that. The "id" component is optional.
You can't replicate what isn't there.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, (continued) Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, william(at)elan.net Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly <= Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp

Previous by Date:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly
Next by Date:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos
Previous by Thread:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Robert A. Rosenberg
Next by Thread:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]