Re: "Header Reordering", yet again


Valdis Klētnieks writes:

If you're planning to go down this bad-idea path, you *really* need tospecify
that the two headers are linked with some glob that has msgid-like uniqueness
properties....


Or just use DomainKeys to sign the Received-SPF header field ;)

Arnt

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, (continued) Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly Is it really FUD? [Re: "Header Reordering", yet again], Hector Santos Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Hector Santos Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Arnt Gulbrandsen <= Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, william(at)elan.net Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Robert A. Rosenberg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp

Previous by Date:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Paul Smith
Next by Date:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann
Previous by Thread:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks
Next by Thread:	Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]