[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MTAMARK (was: SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt)

2005-05-25 04:35:13

On Wed May 25 2005 05:43, Tony Finch wrote:

On Tue, 24 May 2005, Bruce Lilly wrote:
On Tue May 24 2005 16:43, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:09:12AM -0400, Bruce Lilly wrote:
On Mon May 23 2005 14:39, Frank Ellermann wrote:

The "surviving" LMAP proposals (CSV, MTAMARK, SPF)
do very different things, SPF covers some older ideas.

They all suffer from similar problems involving the issues

*ALL* is wrong as MTAMARK does neither of the 3 points you have

OK, I stand corrected.

The same is true for CSV.

No.  Being based in a comparison of IP addresses derived from a DNS RR
related to a domain name from EHLO/HELO, it suffers from the same
problems with that approach as SPF.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>