On Wed May 25 2005 05:43, Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Bruce Lilly wrote:
On Tue May 24 2005 16:43, Markus Stumpf wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:09:12AM -0400, Bruce Lilly wrote:
On Mon May 23 2005 14:39, Frank Ellermann wrote:
The "surviving" LMAP proposals (CSV, MTAMARK, SPF)
do very different things, SPF covers some older ideas.
They all suffer from similar problems involving the issues
*ALL* is wrong as MTAMARK does neither of the 3 points you have
OK, I stand corrected.
The same is true for CSV.
No. Being based in a comparison of IP addresses derived from a DNS RR
related to a domain name from EHLO/HELO, it suffers from the same
problems with that approach as SPF.