Re: "Header Reordering", yet again
2005-05-27 08:33:57
ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com writes:
Reordering fields of different types relative to each other is another
matter. Our MTA does this routinely - the facility we provide for
this is heavily used. The reason is that there are lots of things out
there which are order-sensitive in one way or another.
Could you give a few examples? Why do your customers use this heavily?
Of course these things are broken, but when we're talking about
breakage in very popular systems saying they should behave this way
is a waste of time.
Well, yes and no... I suppose expecting it to stop is futile, but
talking about breakage may have other beneficial results. For a start,
Bruce Lilly will post the URL to your elaboration next time we have the
same thread ;)
Arnt
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- "Envelope", yet again, (continued)
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, Bruce Lilly
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, John C Klensin
- Re: "Envelope", yet again, Bruce Lilly
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, David MacQuigg
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again,
Arnt Gulbrandsen <=
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Paul Smith
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Lyndon Nerenberg
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Paul Smith
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Bruce Lilly
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, ned+ietf-smtp
- Re: "Header Reordering", yet again, Frank Ellermann
|
|
|