Re: [Asrg] I-D: Email Submission Between Independent Networks

Richard,

Since the draft is requesting standardization as a BCP, it calls for public 
discussion to be on the ietf-smtp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org 
<http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/> mailing list.

I am taking the liberty of forwarding your note to that list, in an attempt to 
move any discussion about the draft to that venue.

d/


>  In article 
> <Pine(_dot_)BSI(_dot_)4(_dot_)56(_dot_)0505061848230(_dot_)22943(_at_)tom(_dot_)iecc(_dot_)com>,
>  John R
>  Levine <johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com> writes
>
> >  Here's the latest draft of the proposed BCP from Carl Hutzler et al
> >  about
> >  mail submission.  I think it's pretty good and barring a lot of hate
> >  mail
> >  I'd like to say that the ASRG likes it so I can nudge it down the path
> >  to
> >  BCP-hood.
> >
> >  [ A MIME TEXT / plain part was included here. ]
>  it includes the text
>
>  Best practices are:
>
>  o  MSAs MUST support the SUBMISSION port, for MUAs accessing from
>  outside the MSA's local environment.
>
>  but probably means
>
>  o  MSAs MUST support the SUBMISSION port if MUAs are permitted
>  access from outside the MSA's local environment.
>
>  - --
>  richard                                              Richard Clayton
>
>  They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
>  safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.         Benjamin Franklin




  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net