esmtpa / esmtpsa (was: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"-

ietf-smtp

esmtpa / esmtpsa (was: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards)

2005-08-22 18:46:45


Tony Finch wrote:

See for example the "esmtpa" in this message header. This is
useful for software like SpamAssassin which likes to be able
to work out which Received: lines correspond to message
submission and which to message relay.


Cute idea, noted just in case, I'm not sure whether SpamCop
already uses this as an "enough already" indicator.  Bye, Frank

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, thomas schorpp Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, thomas schorpp Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Arnt Gulbrandsen Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Frank Ellermann Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Tony Finch esmtpa / esmtpsa (was: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards), Frank Ellermann <=

Previous by Date:	Re: RFC 3207 (STARTTLS) question, Eric A. Hall
Next by Date:	Re: RFC 3207 (STARTTLS) question, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Previous by Thread:	Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, Tony Finch
Next by Thread:	Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of, willemien
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]